ANTHROPIC-CCAR-P: Claude Certified Architect - Professional (CCAR-P)
Browse certifications
Exam Resources
Official learning paths, exam details, skills measured, and community resources to supplement your study.
About the CCAR-P Exam
Before buying: Anthropic currently limits exam registration to employees of Claude Partner Network organisations, using a recognised company email domain. Buying this independent revision bank does not establish eligibility or include an exam voucher. Check Anthropic’s current certification eligibility FAQ before planning an exam.
Claude Certified Architect - Professional covers the design and delivery of production systems built with Claude. It tests architectural choices, integration, evaluation, safety, stakeholder communication, and the team’s ability to operate the result.
This bank contains 250 original single-answer revision questions mapped to the public CCAR-P Exam Guide, version 1.0, July 2026. It is not official Anthropic exam material or endorsed training. The real exam also includes multiple-response items. The smallest domain is deliberately oversampled for study breadth; this is not a proportional exam simulation, and a practice score does not predict an exam result.
Who Should Take This Exam?
The guide describes experienced solution architects, technical leads, and engineers who take responsibility for a Claude system from discovery through production. It recommends three or more years in systems architecture or platform engineering, and six or more months working with Claude or comparable systems in production. These are recommendations, not mandatory prerequisites. Partner-only registration still applies.
Architect - Foundations is not a mandatory prerequisite for Professional. They are separate credentials. This bank focuses on choosing and defending an architecture under concrete constraints, rather than recalling an API field or a product label in isolation.
Exam Quick Facts
These figures come from the July 2026 guide. Check the official guide and current FAQ before booking; the practice-bank price is separate from the exam fee.
| Detail | Value |
|---|---|
| Credential | Claude Certified Architect - Professional (CCAR-P) |
| Questions | 63 multiple-choice and multiple-response items; each item states how many responses to select |
| Time | 120 minutes |
| Pass Score | Scaled score of 720 on a 100-1,000 scale |
| Exam Fee | USD $175 |
| Delivery | Proctored online and/or at a test centre, per program policy |
| Validity | 12 months after award |
| Eligibility | Claude Partner Network employees with a recognised employer email domain |
| Official Guide | Anthropic’s July 2026 CCAR-P exam guide |
Exam Domains & Weights
The official weights total 100%. Practice counts are an editorial study allocation, not the exam’s distribution. We provide at least 24 questions per domain, so Developer Productivity & Operational Enablement has more practice coverage than its 7% exam weight would imply.
| Domain | Official Weight | Practice Questions |
|---|---|---|
| Solution Design & Architecture | 17% | 42 |
| Claude Models, Prompting & Context Engineering | 13% | 32 |
| Integration | 19% | 46 |
| Evaluation, Testing & Optimization | 16% | 38 |
| Governance, Safety & Risk Management | 14% | 34 |
| Stakeholder Communication & Lifecycle Management | 14% | 34 |
| Developer Productivity & Operational Enablement | 7% | 24 |
| Total | 100% | 250 |
Practice Questions - 250 Original Scenarios
Try 20 questions free, with no account needed. Full bank access costs US$9 for one year, with explanations, reasoning for the wrong answers, public-source references, and progress tracking.
Every practice item has four options and one correct answer. The real exam’s multiple-response format is not reproduced by this bank. Use the questions to identify topics to practise, not to estimate an official pass mark.
Study Tips
- Start with Integration, the largest official domain at 19%. Trace data, permissions, retrieval, tool calls, and monitoring through an actual system. Explain why each connection belongs there.
- Make trade-offs measurable. Define an acceptable output, latency target, and cost budget before comparing models or architectures. A larger model is not automatically the right choice.
- Separate architecture from implementation trivia. Explain which steps need a fixed workflow, which need model judgement, and where a person must approve a consequential action.
- Use evaluations as acceptance criteria. Include representative successful cases, difficult cases, and unsafe requests. Re-run the same tests when a model, prompt, retrieval strategy, or tool changes.
- Map each obligation to a control and an owner. Choosing Claude does not, by itself, make the surrounding application compliant. Know what evidence a reviewer needs.
- Practise the handoff. Document decisions, failure modes, escalation routes, and operating instructions so the team can support the system without its original architect.